What Does the Decision to Eliminate GCORR Cost the Church?

Yesterday the actions of the General Conference voted to eliminate The General Commission on Religion and Race (GCORR), an agency of the church who was mandated by the church and created after the ending of the racially segregated Central Jurisdiction within the church. I cannot help but to question what it means for the life and well-being of the church. The eradication of GCORR has ripple effects that will be felt widely and deeply throughout the full church for years to come. At a time when the church we love is seeking to be and become a truly global family in Christ, the core body of the church charged with helping us work cross-culturally will cease to exist with no other resources within the church to replace it.

What does the loss of GCORR cost the church? Continue reading

The Sins of the Fathers: Concerns about Loss of Justice in New Compromised Structure Plan

by Erin Hawkins

A new compromised plan between Plan B and The CT/IOT proposals will soon be coming before the General Conference. The process for restructuring our denomination has largely been constructed by a small group of leaders, dominated by white males from the United States.  It raises critical concerns around patterns of neo-colonialism, systemic racism and the overwhelming and abusive use of White privilege.  To allow the condensed use of immense power is to dismiss the voices that made it clear in the General Administration Legislative Committee that these plans are deplorably deficient in addressing the needs of the emerging church locally and globally. Continue reading

We Will Change and Adapt to be Something New in this New World

Rachel Birkhahn-RommelfangerMuch attention has been given today to the voices of young delegates and rightfully so.  And so, this afternoon, I want to share to share my conversation with a young delegate whose thoughtful perspectives I value greatly. Rachel Birkhahn-Rommelfanger, delegate from the Northern Illinois Conference speaks openly with me on issues facing us in General Conference and issues of relevance to the future of the Church. Continue reading

What Role Should Ethnic Plans Play in the Future of the Church?

This is a busy week for interviews.  Earlier this week my conversation with respected leaders within the Church focused on the Ministry Study, elimination of guaranteed appointments, streamlining the process of ordained ministry, and renewal of the cultural call to reach more young people.

Today, I sit down with Rev. Fred Allen, Executive Director of Strengthening the Black Church for the 21st Century, and Rev. Paul Chang, Executive Director of the Korean National Plan to openly discuss the UMC Ethnic Plans. Fred and Paul respond to three core questions relating to key conversations within the Church leading into GC2012. What role do they envision the ethnic plans having in the future of the Church? How do they respond to the concern that continuing to invest in the plans is unwise because of perceptions that the plans did not produce the amount of fruit expected? How does the work of the ethnic plans connect to the effort to create more vital congregations? Continue reading

Is Now the Time for Change?

In this week’s conversation relating to General Conference 2012, I speak with two respected members of the UM Study of Ministry Commission—Rev. Tom Choi, District Superintendant of the Hawaii District of the California Pacific Annual Conference and Rev. Jasmine Smothers, Assistant Director for Connectional Ministries in the North Georgia Annual Conference.

In their frank discussion of the Ministry Study and its efforts to bring about change in the Church, Revs Choi and Smothers focus on three controversial subjects:  elimination of guaranteed appointments, streamlining the process of ordained ministry, and renewal of the cultural of call to reach more young people.

They raise the question—at some point we must get out of our boats and brave the water—is now that time?

A Response from Neil Alexander, IOT team member on “Are We Ready To Be A Relevant Church?” Post

One of the primary purposes of this blog is to invite conversation. Recently Neil Alexander, President and Publisher of The United Methodist Publishing House (UMPH) of The United Methodist Church and member of the Connectional Table and Interim Operations Team, responded to my post questioning “Are We Ready to Be A Relevant Church?”. I appreciate Neil’s thoughtful responses and want to further the conversation by sharing them more broadly.

From Neil Alexander on March 26, 2012…

Erin, I very much agree with many of the points you artfully articulate, and want to offer clarifications that I trust might enrich our thinking together. You demonstrate in your essay as you did as a member of the Call to Action Steering Team, appreciations and insights that help the church move forward with imagination, courage and faithfulness.

I chime in as one more voice to affirm completely the importance of assuring processes and mechanisms that give the church confidence that there are both proactive commitments and reliable safeguards to assure equity, justice, diversity in our shared life. We must also give concerted attention to developing genuine cultural competencies for reaching, inviting and embracing emerging populations and the full participation and leadership of all communities in the life of the church.

Some of what you rightfully critique seems to hinge on assumptions that are not detailed or intended in the IOT proposals and CT legislation.  When IOT made the report to CT in the summer (that was reworked as legislative petitions by the Connectional Table), we did not emphasize details about the inner workings of the proposed Center for Connectional Mission and Ministry in terms of work products or processes.  This was intentional as the Interim Operations Team has said repeatedly that experience and best practices confirm that what’s needed is the ability to focus resources in a concerted way on the adaptive challenge (creating more vial congregations) and this is best achieved with a unified, nimble and highly accountable agency structure for both governance and administration. Continue reading

Getting To Know the General Commission on Religion and Race: Past, Present and Future

The United Methodist News Service over the past month, in preparation for 2012 General Conference, has asked general agencies to answer five questions about their agency’s role in the church. Check out the responses of the General Commission on Religion and Race (GCORR) and learn more about how the agency is working with churches, annual conferences, seminaries, cabinets and Boards of Ordained Ministry to help the church live into a new reality that is distinct from the past. 

 

What the UMC Can Learn from the Trayvon Martin Tragedy

So here we are moving toward the exit of the twentieth century with a religious community largely adjusted to the status quo, standing as a tail-light behind other community agencies rather than a headlight leading men to higher levels of justice.” – Dr. Martin Luther King, Letter From The Birmingham Jail. April 16, 1963

The world has watched media coverage and commentary on the events surrounding the killing of a 17 year old unarmed African American boy named Trayvon Martin. This tragedy has gained momentum and sparked necessary and in some cases, hateful and hurtful dialogue. As I have stood in solidarity with those heartbroken calling for justice in the midst of senseless violence I can’t help but see connections between the racial dynamics and rhetoric of this case and those of The United Methodist Church. Perhaps, this tragedy presents a teachable moment for us and an opportunity to choose a more excellent way in our living together so that we can be light and salt in a world so desperately needing a vision of God’s beloved community.

Here are a few lessons that I hope we can finally learn as a denomination as a result of this case:

Race and racism are real. We’ve all heard these statements, “I don’t see color; I only see the person”; “The President is African American, we’re post –racial”; “Race is a social construct, there really isn’t anything different about us after all we all bleed red.” Comments such as these and the beliefs that support them seek to down play or even deny the importance that race and racism play in virtually every aspect of society. Questions about George Zimmerman’s ethnic identification and whether or not he expressed racist ideas before the shooting only obfuscate the reality that there is a history and pattern of disparate treatment based on skin color in this country. Features of that history and pattern can be seen in the Trayvon Martin case. Racism does not require intent. When racial incidents happen in the Church the response is all too often one of defense, rationalization, explaining away, or avoidance. Congregations that treat a pastor of color and their family poorly are described as simply, ‘not a good fit’ or the church is labeled as “troubled” with little to no addressing of their behavior. Conference and agency staff who feel persuaded to point out racial inequities in the workplace are branded as ‘not team players’ and threatened with job loss. People of color are asked to trust (without conditions or accountability measures) that a commitment to diversity will be maintained when our racial history and patterns as a denomination indicate that such blind trust may be foolhardy. Our inclination to sublimate our struggles with race as a church also makes us unable to answer the call to true transformational discipleship. In light of this tragedy we have an opportunity to acknowledge the history and legacy of race and racism in Methodism and to take concrete steps of vigilance against this sin in our midst.

Despite significant racial gains, equity has not yet been achieved. While the church has publically stated principles rejecting racism and valuing diversity and inclusion we can still track as an institution the fault lines of race that run throughout the denomination. Our church is not reflecting the growth of communities of color within the United States. Racial division within congregational membership and leadership continues unabated. Native Americans and Pacific Islanders continue to seek full participation in the highest levels of denominational leadership. The death of Trayvon Martin reminds us that although society has come a long way, the systems that govern our land aren’t equitable or equal for everyone. So it is in the church. We still maintain policies and practices that ensure that ordination, appointment, nominations, and ministry support systems don’t produce favorable results for communities of color at the same rate as they do for white communities.

Equity is more than diversity. The notion of racial equity is closely tied to the notion of gaps. The Trayvon Martin case illuminates gaps in the justice system as well as in public perception about racial issues. As a church we are faced with gaps in our anti-discrimination accountability systems, our systems to select and appoint diverse leadership, and our systems to engage the mission of the church in growing communities that do not reflect the dominant culture of our denomination. For more than 40 years the church has looked to GCORR to continue to challenge the existence of these and other gaps and to equip the church to take meaningful steps to close them. The denomination’s intentionality in having such an agency has contributed in part to our success in taking positive steps in our journey as a multi-cultural community. Now, in an effort to be even more effective in this mission, GCORR has drafted legislation that offers a fresh articulation of our mandate and responsibilities in response to the Church’s need for greater relevance in an increasingly diverse global world. The agency’s commitment is to help leaders at all levels of the Church all over the world close the gaps that hold us back from reaching more people, more diverse people, and more young people. The church will be mediocre at best if there is no clear structure and accountability to address conditions, policies, and practices that keep the growing populations –that we must reach if we are to thrive- on the margins economically, educationally, and socially.

In about one month the General Conference will convene and it will be an opportunity for the Church to demonstrate that we can indeed turn around the lament of Dr. King and be a headlight to society because of our faithfulness. The Acts of Repentance for Indigenous Peoples is an opportunity to acknowledge that race and racism are in fact real and are sinful conditions that must be repented of by all who call themselves United Methodist. Ensuring that the racial gaps in our denomination are closed rather than widened on issues related to the security of appointment, process of selecting leaders for General Agency and Conference boards or the proposed Center of Mission and Ministry, as well as the quadrennial budget will demonstrate that we are continuing to strive for equity. Passing legislation that seeks to broaden the table and deepen our witness as Christians engaged in God’s work of creating a new heaven and a new earth, including the new mandate and responsibilities of GCORR regardless of any structural change will be a sign that the Church’s commitment is more than talk.

The sadness that we feel over the loss of Trayvon Martin does not have to be the end of the story. My most fervent prayer is that our church and world will have eyes to see and ears to hear that striving for perfection means doing the hard work of acknowledging, repenting and turning with intentionality toward a new way of living. After all, ‘Tis the season….

The Act of Repentance: What’s the Point?

Welcome to this week’s conversation with church leaders on prominent issues relating to General Conference 2012. This week, The Rev. Anita Phillips, Executive Director of the Native American Comprehensive Plan and Rev. Stephen Sidorak, Jr., General Secretary for the General Commission on Christian Unity and Interreligious Concerns, and I discuss the relevance of the Act of Repentance that will be held during General Conference. The 2008 General Conference assigned to the General Commission on Christian Unity and Interreligious Concerns the task to help lead our whole church toward a 2012 General Conference Act of Repentance on “Healing Relationships with Indigenous Persons.”  Continue reading

Are We Ready to be a Relevant Church?

For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not first sit down and estimate the cost, to see whether he has enough to complete it? Otherwise, when he has laid a foundation and is not able to finish, all who see it will begin to ridicule him…  Luke 14:28-29, NRSV

I recently attended a meeting of the Connectional Table (CT) where the legislation to enact the recommendations of the Interim Operations Team (IOT) was discussed. There was significant debate about the merits and shortcomings of the proposals and, in particular, the proposal regarding the reorganization of the General Agencies.

I believe that the time has come to reassess and realign the systems of the General church, including the general agencies. In order to do that well, all ministries must be evaluated and weighed in light of our most pressing needs as a church and our mission, “to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world.” In the current proposal, all of the current ministries are simply moved around and given new labels without any clear vision of how this reordering enhances our effectiveness or even frees us from institutional inertia. Continue reading